Analytics Approach
I start with the business decision, then work backwards into the data, model, and validation. My priority is correctness and decision usefulness — not flashy visuals.
Principles
The rules I follow to keep dashboards accurate, trusted, and usable under pressure.
My workflow
A repeatable process that works across operational, inventory, finance, and automation reporting.
What decision will someone make from this? Who uses it, how often, and what “good” looks like.
Identify source tables/fields and clarify edge cases early (partials, cancels, returns, backorders, adjustments).
Clean the grain, standardize keys/dates, and build a model that behaves correctly under slicing and drill-through.
Implement measures with clear naming, then design visuals around scanning, prioritizing, and drilling to root cause.
Reconcile totals, spot-check records, confirm definitions with stakeholders, then monitor for drift (new data patterns, process changes).
Quality checks I always run
These checks prevent silent errors and keep dashboards trusted by ops and leadership.
- Compare totals to ERP/CRM views
- Validate date window logic (cutoffs/time zones)
- Check the grain (one row = one thing)
- Look for duplicate keys / many-to-many traps
- Confirm filters flow as intended
- Test slicing by vendor/item/location/date
- Spot-check real records end-to-end
- Validate edge cases (partials/returns/voids)
- Confirm definitions with stakeholders
Where this shows up in my work
These projects apply the same approach: clear definitions, reconciliation, and decision-first reporting.
Clear definitions for fast/slow/dead stock, with a model that stays stable under slicing and drill-down.
Automated data capture + system updates to keep operational fields (like ETAs) consistently maintained.
KPI-driven risk view built for follow-up prioritization, validated against Business Central totals.
Daily operational snapshot with reconciliation and KPI logging for consistent leadership reporting.